The creative friction: AI enters the frame
At the 2025 Venice Film Festival and other marquee events, the debate over artificial intelligence in filmmaking took centre-stage. While some festivals fast-track discussions on AI use, others remain undecided on the boundaries of human authorship. AIMICI+1 The Academy Awards (Oscars) have officially updated their rules: films that use generative AI won’t be penalised—but the creative authorship must still feel “human-led”. The Verge
In this context, studios such as Black Hangar Studios—where physical infrastructure, human crews and analogue workflow often intersect with digital tools—play a pivotal role. The question is no longer simply about whether to use AI; it’s about how to use it without sacrificing the tactile, human dimension of filmmaking.
Where the human touch still leads
While generative AI excels at rapid visual experimentation and streamlining workflows, it struggles with emotional nuance, collaborative spontaneity and the unpredictable choreography of human performance. For example, the performance-art union SAG‑AFTRA has condemned the use of an AI-generated actress, arguing that it “threatens livelihoods and devalues human artistry”. EW.com+1
Behind the camera, cinematographers, lighting crews, set builders and lab technicians make thousands of micro-decisions—choices about colour temperature, lens flare, frame rhythm, and film grain that simply cannot be automated without losing character. Whether the scene is shot on digital or on celluloid, the material process of processing, scanning and post-production retains a human imprint. These choices matter to labs like CPC London, which works with physical film processing and high-resolution scanning, ensuring creative decisions survive the workflow from camera to archive.
AI as collaborator—not replacement
Rather than a replacement for human craft, many filmmakers now see AI as a kind of digital assistant: helpful for pre-visualisation, rough-cut edits, or generating early concept sequences—but always subject to human oversight. One industry report describes this as shifting the role of generative AI from “metaphorically partner” to a purely “tool-box asset”. arXiv
This distinction matters. When a studio like Black Hangar hosts a shoot using virtual production, LED volumes and camera tracking, the human crew still remains the arbiter of texture, pacing and on-set spontaneity. AI can stimulate possibilities—but it’s human hands that resolve them into cinematic sequence. Embracing that insight positions a facility not only as technically capable, but creatively rigorous.
What that means for production-planning
- Workflow transparency: When AI is used in visual effects, set extension or even casting, filmmakers and post-production houses should clearly define “who did what”. Human teams must remain front and centre in decisions about aesthetic and narrative.
- Lab and scan fidelity: If footage is captured on film (35 mm/65 mm) or high-grade digital, the processing and scanning stages need human-led calibration—adjusting grain, colour checking, archiving metadata. For CPC London, that means offering film-processing, scanning and restoration with human oversight.
- Studio & crew alignment: Choosing a studio environment (such as Black Hangar) that values craft, human crew workflow and collaborative logistics is critical. Even when AI accelerators are in play, the core of production remains human.
- Ethical & creative boundaries: Films that rely entirely on AI assets risk criticism—or worse, disqualification—from awards bodies. Defining the “human authorship element” isn’t just artistic—it has industry implications.
Why human-led production still wins
Audiences may not articulate the reasons, but they feel the difference when human craft is on show: a flicker of film grain, subtle variations in lighting, an actor’s micro-gesture, a real set-piece solved on location rather than algorithmically assembled. These are the attributes that distinguish cinematic experience and preserve the authenticity of the medium.
In a filmmaking world increasingly enamoured with automation, the studios that preserve human-centric workflows, support high-fidelity scanning and processing, and respect the physical craft of cinema hold more than nostalgic value—they hold competitive edge. At the intersection of stage, camera and post-lab lies the place where human touch remains the differentiator.
If you’re a cinematographer, producer or content creator navigating today’s digital-/analogue mix and want a partner that understands both high-tech tools and human craft, talk to CPC London. We offer comprehensive film processing, high-resolution scanning, printing and restoration services that honour the intent behind the image—whether shot using analogue, digital or hybrid workflows.
#HumanTouchInFilm #AIinFilmmaking #FilmProduction2025 #FilmScanning #AnalogueCinema